- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Matrix X vs S950
Alpha GEO Matrix X vs Stonex S950
What Matrix X does better (3) and where S950 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Matrix XS950
| Matrix X | S950 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 59 mm | +31 mm |
| Width | 128 mm | 142 mm | −14 mm |
| Depth | 128 mm | 142 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 810 g | +190 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Matrix X better than S950?
- Battery life15 h vs 4 h3.8×
- Built-in UHF radioYes · S950: No
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%
Why is S950 better than Matrix X?
- Weight1,000 g vs 810 g+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 62 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 4 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 7,000 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 810 g |
| Width | 128 mm | 142 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 59 mm |
| Depth | 128 mm | 142 mm |
