- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- ARS30 vs Mercury Laser RTK
Archimedes Innovation ARS30 vs ComNav Mercury Laser RTK
What ARS30 does better (1) and where Mercury Laser RTK wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Positioning7.5
Why is ARS30 better than Mercury Laser RTK?
- Built-in UHF radioYes · Mercury Laser RTK: No
Why is Mercury Laser RTK better than ARS30?
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 1,590+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,590 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 5 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Position update rate | — | 20 Hz |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 120° |
| Correction sources | UHF radio | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 4 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 15 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1.5 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 65 °C |
| Weight | — | 500 g |
| Width | — | 81 mm |
| Height | — | 171 mm |
| Depth | — | 76 mm |
| Housing material | — | Aluminium magnesium alloy |
