- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Phantom 3 Slope vs eTrex SE
Bushnell Phantom 3 Slope vs Garmin eTrex SE
What Phantom 3 Slope does better (2) and where eTrex SE wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display2.4
5.0Maps & navigation2.8
5.2Battery8.3
3.7Durability8.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom 3 SlopeeTrex SE
| Phantom 3 Slope | eTrex SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 76 mm | 100 mm | −24 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 61 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 33 mm | −15 mm |
| Weight | 78 g | 156 g | −78 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom 3 Slope better than eTrex SE?
- Preloaded mapsYes · eTrex SE: No
- Weight78 g vs 156 g2×
Why is eTrex SE better than Phantom 3 Slope?
- Battery life18 h vs 168 h9.3×
- Satellite systems supported1 vs 55×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 2.2″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 320 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 185 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | No |
| Map types | Golf courses | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Preloaded golf courses | 38,000 | — |
| Internal storage | — | 0.03 GB |
| Electronic compass | — | Yes |
| Waypoints | — | 1,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 168 h |
| Power source | — | AA batteries |
| Runs on AA batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX6 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 78 g | 156 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 61 mm |
| Height | 76 mm | 100 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 33 mm |
