- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Phantom vs Phantom 3 Slope
Bushnell Phantom vs Bushnell Phantom 3 Slope
What Phantom does better (1) and where Phantom 3 Slope wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Display4.3
2.9Maps & navigation5.0
2.6Battery5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
PhantomPhantom 3 Slope
| Phantom | Phantom 3 Slope | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59 mm | 76 mm | −17 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 60 mm | −2 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 18 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 52 g | 78 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom better than Phantom 3 Slope?
- Weight52 g vs 78 g+50%
Why is Phantom 3 Slope better than Phantom?
- Battery life10 h vs 18 h+80%
- Screen size1.9″ vs 2.2″+16%
- Preloaded golf courses36,000 vs 38,000+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 1 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.9″ | 2.2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map types | Golf courses | Golf courses |
| Preloaded golf courses | 36,000 | 38,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 18 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX6 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx6 |
| Weight | 52 g | 78 g |
| Width | 58 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 59 mm | 76 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 18 mm |
