- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Phantom vs eTrex 22x
Bushnell Phantom vs Garmin eTrex 22x
What Phantom does better (1) and where eTrex 22x wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PhantomeTrex 22x
| Phantom | eTrex 22x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59 mm | 103 mm | −44 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 54 mm | +4 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 33 mm | −13 mm |
| Weight | 52 g | 142 g | −90 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom better than eTrex 22x?
- Weight52 g vs 142 g2.7×
Why is eTrex 22x better than Phantom?
- Battery life10 h vs 25 h2.5×
- Satellite systems supported1 vs 22×
- Screen size1.9″ vs 2.2″+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 2 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.9″ | 2.2″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 320 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 182 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map types | Golf courses | Road, Topographic |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Preloaded golf courses | 36,000 | — |
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Waypoints | — | 2,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| ANT+ | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 25 h |
| Power source | — | Rechargeable pack or AA |
| Runs on AA batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Weight | 52 g | 142 g |
| Width | 58 mm | 54 mm |
| Height | 59 mm | 103 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 33 mm |
