- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Phantom vs eTrex SE
Bushnell Phantom vs Garmin eTrex SE
What Phantom does better (2) and where eTrex SE wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PhantomeTrex SE
| Phantom | eTrex SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59 mm | 100 mm | −41 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 61 mm | −3 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 33 mm | −13 mm |
| Weight | 52 g | 156 g | −104 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom better than eTrex SE?
- Weight52 g vs 156 g3×
- Preloaded mapsYes · eTrex SE: No
Why is eTrex SE better than Phantom?
- Battery life10 h vs 168 h16.8×
- Satellite systems supported1 vs 55×
- Screen size1.9″ vs 2.2″+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.9″ | 2.2″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 320 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 185 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | No |
| Map types | Golf courses | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Preloaded golf courses | 36,000 | — |
| Internal storage | — | 0.03 GB |
| Electronic compass | — | Yes |
| Waypoints | — | 1,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 168 h |
| Power source | — | AA batteries |
| Runs on AA batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Weight | 52 g | 156 g |
| Width | 58 mm | 61 mm |
| Height | 59 mm | 100 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 33 mm |
