- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Wingman Mini vs eTrex SE
Bushnell Wingman Mini vs Garmin eTrex SE
What Wingman Mini does better (1) and where eTrex SE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Maps & navigation2.8
7.0Durability8.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Wingman MinieTrex SE
| Wingman Mini | eTrex SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 102 mm | 100 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 82 mm | 61 mm | +21 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 33 mm | +7 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 156 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Wingman Mini better than eTrex SE?
- Preloaded mapsYes · eTrex SE: No
Why is eTrex SE better than Wingman Mini?
- Satellite systems supported1 vs 55×
- Weight170 g vs 156 g+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 2.2″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 320 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 185 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | No |
| Map types | Golf courses | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Preloaded golf courses | 38,000 | — |
| Internal storage | — | 0.03 GB |
| Electronic compass | — | Yes |
| Waypoints | — | 1,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 168 h |
| Power source | — | AA batteries |
| Runs on AA batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 170 g | 156 g |
| Width | 82 mm | 61 mm |
| Height | 102 mm | 100 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 33 mm |
