- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i73+ vs N2
CHCNAV i73+ vs ComNav N2
What i73+ does better (1) and where N2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
i73+N2
| i73+ | N2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 85 mm | 48 mm | +37 mm |
| Width | 119 mm | 149 mm | −30 mm |
| Weight | 730 g | 670 g | +60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i73+ better than N2?
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
Why is N2 better than i73+?
- Battery life18 h vs 20 h+11%
- Tracking channels624 vs 1,5902.5×
- Weight730 g vs 670 g+9%
- Battery capacity6,800 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Tracking channels | 624 | 1,590 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | — |
| External power input | — | 5/9V |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 730 g | 670 g |
| Width | 119 mm | 149 mm |
| Height | 85 mm | 48 mm |
| Depth | 119 mm | — |
| Housing material | — | magnesium aluminum alloy |
