- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i85 vs inBase
CHCNAV i85 vs INTEC inBase
What i85 does better (4) and where inBase wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is i85 better than inBase?
- Battery life20 h vs 18 h+11%
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
- Weight800 g vs 850 g+6%
- Tracking channels1,892 vs 1,408+34%
Why is inBase better than i85?
inBase has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,892 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 60° | 120° |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 18 h |
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | — |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | — |
| External power input | 5V / 2A | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | — |
| Weight | 800 g | 850 g |
| Width | 134 mm | — |
| Height | 86 mm | — |
| Depth | 134 mm | — |
| Housing material | Metal (all-in-one design) | ABS |
