LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. i89 vs A300

CHCNAV i89 vs ComNav A300

What i89 does better (2) and where A300 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV i89
CHCNAV · 2023i89
8.1Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
ComNav A300
ComNav · 2023A300
8.0Score
2 advantages
5.8Positioning8.4
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
8.7Durability7.8

Why is i89 better than A300?

  1. Weight750 g vs 2,000 g2.7×
  2. Tracking channels1,408 vs 965+46%

Why is A300 better than i89?

  1. Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
  2. Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 75 °C+15%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported56
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes—
Frequency bandsL1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3—
Tracking channels1,408965
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)YesYes
RTK positioningYesYes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm8 mm
RTK accuracy (vertical)15 mm—
Static accuracy (horizontal)—2.5 mm
Tilt compensation (IMU)Yes—
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, SBASNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS
Built-in UHF radioYesYes
Raw data logging (RINEX)Yes—
Maps & navigation
Internal storage8 GB—
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYesYes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
CameraYes—
Battery & power
Battery life16 h—
External power input5 V / 2 A6-36
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
MIL-STD-810Yes—
Drop resistance—2 m
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)65 °C75 °C
Weight750 g2,000 g
Width—250 mm
Height—126 mm
Depth—250 mm
Housing material—FRP cover & aluminum alloy base
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare