LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. M900 vs BX992

ComNav M900 vs Trimble BX992

What M900 does better (3) and where BX992 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

ComNav M900
ComNav · 2021M900
6.8Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Trimble BX992
Trimble · 2021BX992
5.2Score
1 advantage
5.2Positioning2.5
7.6Durability6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

M900BX992
171 × 5618393 × 43185
M900BX992Difference
Height56 mm43 mm+13 mm
Width171 mm93 mm+78 mm
Depth183 mm185 mm−2 mm
Weight1,000 g750 g+250 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M900 better than BX992?

  1. Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · BX992: No
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
  3. Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 70 °C+7%

Why is BX992 better than M900?

  1. Weight1,000 g vs 750 g+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS—
Satellite systems supported5—
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)YesNo
Frequency bandsL1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2L-band
Tracking channels1,226—
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)Yes—
RTK positioningYes—
RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm—
Static accuracy (horizontal)2.5 mm—
Tilt compensation (IMU)—Yes
Dual-antenna headingYesYes
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBASL-band / PPP
Built-in UHF radioYes—
L-band / PPP correctionsYesYes
Raw data logging (RINEX)Yes—
Maps & navigation
Internal storage8 GB—
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)Yes—
Battery & power
External power input5-27 VDC26-pin D-sub connector
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP67
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx7
Drop resistance1 m—
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)75 °C70 °C
Weight1,000 g750 g
Width171 mm93 mm
Height56 mm43 mm
Depth183 mm185 mm
Housing materialMagnesium-aluminium—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare