- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Mars Pro vs N2
ComNav Mars Pro vs ComNav N2
What Mars Pro does better (3) and where N2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mars ProN2
| Mars Pro | N2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 70 mm | 48 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 149 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 1,200 g | 670 g | +530 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mars Pro better than N2?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
- Tracking channels1,668 vs 1,590+5%
Why is N2 better than Mars Pro?
- Weight1,200 g vs 670 g+79%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Tracking channels | 1,668 | 1,590 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | 3 mm |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 10,000 mAh |
| External power input | 7-28VDC | 5/9V |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,200 g | 670 g |
| Width | 150 mm | 149 mm |
| Height | 70 mm | 48 mm |
| Housing material | magnesium aluminum alloy | magnesium aluminum alloy |
