- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Venus Laser RTK vs E200
ComNav Venus Laser RTK vs eSurvey E200
What Venus Laser RTK does better (2) and where E200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Positioning6.1
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
9.0Battery6.4
5.5Durability5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Venus Laser RTKE200
| Venus Laser RTK | E200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 92 mm | +58 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 152 mm | −82 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 152 mm | −72 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Venus Laser RTK better than E200?
- Battery life20 h vs 14 h+43%
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 800+99%
Why is E200 better than Venus Laser RTK?
- Operating temperature (min)-20 °C vs -40 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 65 °C+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Frequency bands | — | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 800 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2 mm |
| Correction sources | SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 14 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,800 mAh |
| External power input | — | 5-pin lemo, 9~28 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 380 g | — |
| Width | 70 mm | 152 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 92 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 152 mm |
| Housing material | macromolecule nanomaterial | Magnesium Alloy |
