- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- C750 vs Tread 2
Elebest C750 vs Garmin Tread 2
What C750 does better (1) and where Tread 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is C750 better than Tread 2?
- Screen size7″ vs 6″+17%
Why is Tread 2 better than C750?
- Internal storage16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Weight446 g vs 340 g+31%
- Pixel density170 ppi vs 245 ppi+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, Galileo |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 2 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6″ |
| Resolution | 1024 × 600 | 1280 × 720 |
| Horizontal resolution | 1,024 px | 1,280 px |
| Vertical resolution | 600 px | 720 px |
| Pixel density | 170 ppi | 245 ppi |
| Display type | IPS LCD | Colour TFT LCD |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Glove-friendly touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | — | Yes |
| Map coverage | — | North America |
| Map types | — | Road, Topographic, Satellite imagery |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Free map updates | — | Yes |
| Live traffic | — | Yes |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | — | Yes |
| Lane assist / junction view | — | Yes |
| Satellite imagery | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Electronic compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 7 h |
| Power source | — | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Weight | 446 g | 340 g |
| Width | — | 156 mm |
| Height | — | 89 mm |
| Depth | — | 25 mm |
