- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Reach RS4 Pro vs S950
Emlid Reach RS4 Pro vs Stonex S950
What Reach RS4 Pro does better (4) and where S950 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Positioning7.0
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
7.8Battery3.4
9.2Durability5.6
Why is Reach RS4 Pro better than S950?
- Battery life16 h vs 4 h4×
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)7 mm vs 8 mm+14%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Built-in UHF radioYes · S950: No
Why is S950 better than Reach RS4 Pro?
S950 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 62 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 4 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 7,000 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | — | 810 g |
| Width | — | 142 mm |
| Height | — | 59 mm |
| Depth | — | 142 mm |
| Housing material | Magnesium alloy | — |
