- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Arrow 100+ vs Approach G12
Eos Arrow 100+ vs Garmin Approach G12
What Arrow 100+ does better (0) and where Approach G12 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Battery7.8
9.6Durability9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Arrow 100+Approach G12
| Arrow 100+ | Approach G12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 125 mm | 51 mm | +74 mm |
| Width | 42 mm | 46 mm | −4 mm |
| Depth | 84 mm | 12 mm | +72 mm |
| Weight | 372 g | 25 g | +347 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Arrow 100+ better than Approach G12?
Arrow 100+ has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Approach G12 better than Arrow 100+?
- Weight372 g vs 25 g14.9×
- Battery life18 h vs 30 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 1 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Tracking channels | 158 | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.3″ |
| Resolution | — | 176 × 176 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 176 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 176 px |
| Pixel density | — | 191 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | — | Yes |
| Map coverage | — | Worldwide |
| Map types | — | Golf courses |
| Preloaded golf courses | — | 43,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 30 h |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | Built-in rechargeable |
| External power input | 12VDC Power Supply | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (max) | 70 °C | — |
| Weight | 372 g | 25 g |
| Width | 42 mm | 46 mm |
| Height | 125 mm | 51 mm |
| Depth | 84 mm | 12 mm |
| Housing material | Xenoy | — |
