- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Arrow Gold+ vs iRTK4
Eos Arrow Gold+ vs Hi-Target iRTK4
What Arrow Gold+ does better (3) and where iRTK4 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Battery4.1
9.8Durability9.0
Why is Arrow Gold+ better than iRTK4?
- Battery life11 h vs 10 h+10%
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Operating temperature (max)85 °C vs 70 °C+21%
Why is iRTK4 better than Arrow Gold+?
iRTK4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L5, E6, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band |
| Tracking channels | — | 866 |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,800 mAh |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | — |
| External power input | 12VDC Power Supply | 6-28V DC external power input (5-pin port) with over-discharge protection |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | 70 °C |
| Weight | 372 g | — |
| Width | 42 mm | — |
| Height | 125 mm | — |
| Depth | 84 mm | — |
| Housing material | Xenoy | Magnesium Alloy |
