- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- E200 vs BX992
eSurvey E200 vs Trimble BX992
What E200 does better (0) and where BX992 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E200BX992
| E200 | BX992 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 92 mm | 43 mm | +49 mm |
| Width | 152 mm | 93 mm | +59 mm |
| Depth | 152 mm | 185 mm | −33 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E200 better than BX992?
E200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is BX992 better than E200?
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 70 °C+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | No |
| Frequency bands | L-band | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 800 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | L-band / PPP |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | — |
| External power input | 5-pin lemo, 9~28 VDC | 26-pin D-sub connector |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 70 °C |
| Weight | — | 750 g |
| Width | 152 mm | 93 mm |
| Height | 92 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 152 mm | 185 mm |
| Housing material | Magnesium Alloy | — |
