- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- eRTK60 vs Archer 4
eSurvey eRTK60 vs Juniper Archer 4
What eRTK60 does better (3) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
eRTK60Archer 4
| eRTK60 | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 102 mm | −27 mm |
| Width | 156 mm | 42 mm | +114 mm |
| Depth | 75 mm | 34 mm | +41 mm |
| Weight | 931 g | 42 g | +889 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is eRTK60 better than Archer 4?
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 1847.7×
- Built-in UHF radioYes · Archer 4: No
- L-band / PPP correctionsYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than eRTK60?
- Weight931 g vs 42 g22.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | No |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | — |
| Hot-swappable batteries | Yes | — |
| External power input | 5-pin(9 - 28V DC 2A, 15V/2A(DC Rated)), Type-C(PD 12V/1.5A) | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | — |
| Weight | 931 g | 42 g |
| Width | 156 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 75 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | — | N/A |
