- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Camper 1095 vs eTrex Touch
Garmin Camper 1095 vs Garmin eTrex Touch
What Camper 1095 does better (1) and where eTrex Touch wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display7.0
8.9Maps & navigation9.3
7.6Battery8.0
Why is Camper 1095 better than eTrex Touch?
- Screen size10.1″ vs 3″3.4×
Why is eTrex Touch better than Camper 1095?
- Battery life2 h vs 130 h65×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 3″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 400 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 400 px |
| Pixel density | — | 155 ppi |
| Display type | Colour TFT LCD | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map coverage | Europe | — |
| Map types | Road | Road, Topographic, Satellite imagery |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Truck / RV routing (size and weight) | Yes | — |
| Satellite imagery | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 2 h | 130 h |
| Power source | — | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Weight | — | 150 g |
| Width | — | 66 mm |
| Height | — | 105 mm |
| Depth | — | 25 mm |
