- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Drive 51 vs Drive 52
Garmin Drive 51 vs Garmin Drive 52
What Drive 51 does better (0) and where Drive 52 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Drive 51Drive 52
| Drive 51 | Drive 52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 84 mm | 84 mm | = |
| Width | 140 mm | 140 mm | = |
| Depth | 20 mm | 20 mm | = |
| Weight | 171 g | 171 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Drive 51 better than Drive 52?
Drive 51 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Drive 52 better than Drive 51?
Drive 52 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5″ | 5″ |
| Resolution | 480 × 272 | 480 × 272 |
| Horizontal resolution | 480 px | 480 px |
| Vertical resolution | 272 px | 272 px |
| Pixel density | 110 ppi | 110 ppi |
| Display type | Colour TFT LCD | Colour TFT LCD |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | — |
| Map coverage | Europe | — |
| Map types | Road | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Free map updates | — | Yes |
| Live traffic | Yes | — |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | — | Yes |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 1 h | 1 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 171 g |
| Width | 140 mm | 140 mm |
| Height | 84 mm | 84 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 20 mm |
