- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- DriveTrack 72 vs inReach Mini 3 Plus
Garmin DriveTrack 72 vs Garmin inReach Mini 3 Plus
What DriveTrack 72 does better (2) and where inReach Mini 3 Plus wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display8.5
6.0Maps & navigation5.9
5.9Connectivity & safety4.4
8.5Battery7.6
6.3Durability3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
DriveTrack 72inReach Mini 3 Plus
| DriveTrack 72 | inReach Mini 3 Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 106 mm | 98 mm | +8 mm |
| Width | 177 mm | 55 mm | +122 mm |
| Depth | 19 mm | 27 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 242 g | 125 g | +117 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DriveTrack 72 better than inReach Mini 3 Plus?
- Screen size7″ vs 1.9″3.7×
- Preloaded mapsYes · inReach Mini 3 Plus: No
Why is inReach Mini 3 Plus better than DriveTrack 72?
- Battery life2 h vs 350 h233.3×
- Satellite systems supported2 vs 42×
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No · DriveTrack 72: Yes
- Weight242 g vs 125 g+94%
- Pixel density171 ppi vs 201 ppi+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 2 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 1.9″ |
| Resolution | 1024 × 600 | 306 × 230 |
| Horizontal resolution | 1,024 px | 306 px |
| Vertical resolution | 600 px | 230 px |
| Pixel density | 171 ppi | 201 ppi |
| Display type | IPS LCD | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | No |
| Map coverage | North America | Worldwide |
| Map types | Road, Topographic, Satellite imagery | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | — |
| Free map updates | Yes | — |
| Live traffic | Yes | — |
| Speed camera alerts | Yes | — |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | Yes | — |
| Lane assist / junction view | Yes | — |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite imagery | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 16 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Electronic compass | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Two-way satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| SOS / emergency alert | — | Yes |
| Satellite network | — | Iridium |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 2 h | 350 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Weight | 242 g | 125 g |
| Width | 177 mm | 55 mm |
| Height | 106 mm | 98 mm |
| Depth | 19 mm | 27 mm |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin DriveCam 76vsGarmin DriveTrack 72
3.98.2
vs
Garmin DriveSmart 86vsGarmin DriveTrack 72
4.88.2
vs
Garmin DriveSmart 76vsGarmin DriveTrack 72
5.58.2
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3vsGarmin inReach Mini 3 Plus
4.75.4
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3 PlusvsGarmin inReach Messenger Plus
5.46.2
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3 PlusvsGarmin inReach Messenger
5.47.8

