LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. eTrex 32x vs Foretrex 801

Garmin eTrex 32x vs Garmin Foretrex 801

What eTrex 32x does better (0) and where Foretrex 801 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin eTrex 32x
Garmin · 2020eTrex 32x
4.5Score
0 advantages≈ $300
vs
Garmin Foretrex 801
Garmin · 2023Foretrex 801
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
2.9Positioning5.8
3.9Display3.9
5.8Battery7.6
9.3Durability5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

eTrex 32xForetrex 801
54 × 1033374 × 4823
eTrex 32xForetrex 801Difference
Height103 mm48 mm+55 mm
Width54 mm74 mm−20 mm
Depth33 mm23 mm+10 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is eTrex 32x better than Foretrex 801?

eTrex 32x has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Foretrex 801 better than eTrex 32x?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 100 h4×
  2. Satellite systems supported2 vs 3+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Garmin eTrex 32xGarmin eTrex 32x≈ $3004.5
Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, Galileo
Satellite systems supported23
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)NoNo
Display
Screen size2.2″2.2″
Resolution240 × 320320 × 240
Horizontal resolution240 px320 px
Vertical resolution320 px240 px
Pixel density182 ppi182 ppi
Display typeTransflective colour (sunlight-readable)Transflective colour (sunlight-readable)
Maps & navigation
Preloaded mapsYes—
Map typesRoad, Topographic—
Turn-by-turn routingYes—
Internal storage8 GB—
Memory card slotYes—
Barometric altimeterYesYes
Electronic compassYes—
Waypoints2,000500
Connectivity & safety
Bluetooth—Yes
ANT+YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Smartphone notifications—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life25 h100 h
Power sourceRechargeable pack or AA—
Runs on AA batteriesYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIPX7IPX7
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
MIL-STD-810—Yes
Weight142 g—
Width54 mm74 mm
Height103 mm48 mm
Depth33 mm23 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare