- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- eTrex 32x vs GPSMAP 64sx
Garmin eTrex 32x vs Garmin GPSMAP 64sx
What eTrex 32x does better (2) and where GPSMAP 64sx wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Positioning7.0
4.0Display2.9
4.6Maps & navigation5.0
9.3Durability7.7
Why is eTrex 32x better than GPSMAP 64sx?
- Weight142 g vs 230 g+62%
- Pixel density182 ppi vs 111 ppi+64%
Why is GPSMAP 64sx better than eTrex 32x?
- Screen size2.2″ vs 2.6″+18%
- Satellite systems supported2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Satellite systems supported | 2 | 3 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 2.6″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 | 160 × 240 |
| Horizontal resolution | 240 px | 160 px |
| Vertical resolution | 320 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 182 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map types | Road, Topographic | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Electronic compass | Yes | — |
| Waypoints | 2,000 | 5,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| ANT+ | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | — |
| Power source | Rechargeable pack or AA | AA batteries |
| Runs on AA batteries | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 142 g | 230 g |
| Width | 54 mm | — |
| Height | 103 mm | — |
| Depth | 33 mm | — |
