- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Foretrex 801 vs Cross Plus
Garmin Foretrex 801 vs TwoNav Cross Plus
What Foretrex 801 does better (1) and where Cross Plus wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Display8.3
7.6Battery4.3
5.9Durability7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Foretrex 801Cross Plus
| Foretrex 801 | Cross Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48 mm | 110 mm | −62 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 63 mm | +11 mm |
| Depth | 23 mm | 21 mm | +2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Foretrex 801 better than Cross Plus?
- Battery life100 h vs 20 h5×
Why is Cross Plus better than Foretrex 801?
- Screen size2.2″ vs 3.2″+45%
- Pixel density182 ppi vs 292 ppi+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 3 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 3.2″ |
| Resolution | 320 × 240 | 800 × 480 |
| Horizontal resolution | 320 px | 800 px |
| Vertical resolution | 240 px | 480 px |
| Pixel density | 182 ppi | 292 ppi |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 32 GB |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Waypoints | 500 | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 100 h | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,300 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 70 °C |
| Weight | — | 172 g |
| Width | 74 mm | 63 mm |
| Height | 48 mm | 110 mm |
| Depth | 23 mm | 21 mm |
