- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- GPSMAP 79s vs Rino 700
Garmin GPSMAP 79s vs Garmin Rino 700
What GPSMAP 79s does better (4) and where Rino 700 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Positioning2.9
7.0Display2.1
4.6Battery2.1
5.9Durability6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
GPSMAP 79sRino 700
| GPSMAP 79s | Rino 700 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 70 mm | 178 mm | −108 mm |
| Width | 170 mm | 60 mm | +110 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 44 mm | −4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GPSMAP 79s better than Rino 700?
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 22.5×
- Battery life19 h vs 13 h+46%
- Screen size3″ vs 2.2″+36%
- Pixel density155 ppi vs 93 ppi+67%
Why is Rino 700 better than GPSMAP 79s?
Rino 700 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 2 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 3″ | 2.2″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 400 | 128 × 160 |
| Horizontal resolution | 240 px | 128 px |
| Vertical resolution | 400 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 155 ppi | 93 ppi |
| Display type | — | Monochrome LCD |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | — | No |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Waypoints | — | 1,000 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 19 h | 13 h |
| Power source | Rechargeable pack or AA | Built-in rechargeable |
| Runs on AA batteries | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | — | 268 g |
| Width | 170 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 70 mm | 178 mm |
| Depth | 40 mm | 44 mm |
