- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- inReach Messenger vs MS401
Garmin inReach Messenger vs Hi-Target MS401
What inReach Messenger does better (1) and where MS401 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Durability9.7
Why is inReach Messenger better than MS401?
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 3+33%
Why is MS401 better than inReach Messenger?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 3 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | — |
| Correction sources | — | L-band / PPP |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.1″ | — |
| Resolution | 160 × 68 | — |
| Horizontal resolution | 160 px | — |
| Vertical resolution | 68 px | — |
| Pixel density | 161 ppi | — |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Two-way satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| SOS / emergency alert | Yes | — |
| Satellite network | Iridium | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| ANT+ | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 672 h | — |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 85 °C |
| Weight | 114 g | — |
| Width | 78 mm | — |
| Height | 64 mm | — |
| Depth | 23 mm | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3vsGarmin inReach Messenger
4.77.8
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3 PlusvsGarmin inReach Messenger
5.47.8
vs
Garmin inReach Messenger PlusvsGarmin inReach Messenger
6.27.8
vs
Garmin inReach MessengervsGarmin inReach Mini 2
7.88.5
vs
ComNav T20vsHi-Target MS401
vs
Topcon HiPer CRvsHi-Target MS401