- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Rino 700 vs Rino 750t
Garmin Rino 700 vs Garmin Rino 750t
What Rino 700 does better (1) and where Rino 750t wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Rino 700Rino 750t
| Rino 700 | Rino 750t | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178 mm | 201 mm | −23 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 66 mm | −6 mm |
| Depth | 44 mm | 41 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 268 g | 348 g | −80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Rino 700 better than Rino 750t?
- Weight268 g vs 348 g+30%
Why is Rino 750t better than Rino 700?
- Preloaded mapsNo · Rino 700: Yes
- Screen size2.2″ vs 3″+36%
- Battery life13 h vs 14 h+8%
- Memory card slotNo · Rino 700: Yes
- Pixel density93 ppi vs 155 ppi+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Satellite systems supported | 2 | 2 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 3″ |
| Resolution | 128 × 160 | 240 × 400 |
| Horizontal resolution | 128 px | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | 160 px | 400 px |
| Pixel density | 93 ppi | 155 ppi |
| Display type | Monochrome LCD | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | No | Yes |
| Map coverage | — | North America |
| Map types | — | Road, Topographic |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 4 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Waypoints | 1,000 | 10,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| ANT+ | — | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 13 h | 14 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Rechargeable pack or AA |
| Runs on AA batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 268 g | 348 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 66 mm |
| Height | 178 mm | 201 mm |
| Depth | 44 mm | 41 mm |
