LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. Rino 700 vs Cross Plus

Garmin Rino 700 vs TwoNav Cross Plus

What Rino 700 does better (0) and where Cross Plus wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Rino 700
Garmin · 2017Rino 700
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ $350
vs
TwoNav Cross Plus
TwoNav · 2023Cross Plus
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
2.1Display8.3
2.1Battery4.3
6.4Durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Rino 700Cross Plus
60 × 1784463 × 11021
Rino 700Cross PlusDifference
Height178 mm110 mm+68 mm
Width60 mm63 mm−3 mm
Depth44 mm21 mm+23 mm
Weight268 g172 g+96 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Rino 700 better than Cross Plus?

Rino 700 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Cross Plus better than Rino 700?

  1. Battery life13 h vs 20 h+54%
  2. Screen size2.2″ vs 3.2″+45%
  3. Weight268 g vs 172 g+56%
  4. Pixel density93 ppi vs 292 ppi3.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Garmin Rino 700Garmin Rino 700≈ $3503.6
Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS—
Satellite systems supported2—
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No—
Display
Screen size2.2″3.2″
Resolution128 × 160800 × 480
Horizontal resolution128 px800 px
Vertical resolution160 px480 px
Pixel density93 ppi292 ppi
Display typeMonochrome LCDTransflective colour (sunlight-readable)
Touchscreen—Yes
Maps & navigation
Preloaded mapsNo—
Internal storage—32 GB
Memory card slotNo—
Waypoints1,000—
Connectivity & safety
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life13 h20 h
Battery capacity—3,300 mAh
Power sourceBuilt-in rechargeable—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIPX7IPX7
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
MIL-STD-810—Yes
Operating temperature (min)—-20 °C
Operating temperature (max)—70 °C
Weight268 g172 g
Width60 mm63 mm
Height178 mm110 mm
Depth44 mm21 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare