LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. Rino 700 vs Terra

Garmin Rino 700 vs TwoNav Terra

What Rino 700 does better (0) and where Terra wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Rino 700
Garmin · 2017Rino 700
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ $350
vs
TwoNav Terra
TwoNav · 2022Terra
7.5Score
3 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
2.1Display8.6
2.1Battery3.5
6.4Durability6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Rino 700Terra
60 × 1784480 × 11519
Rino 700TerraDifference
Height178 mm115 mm+63 mm
Width60 mm80 mm−20 mm
Depth44 mm19 mm+25 mm
Weight268 g198 g+70 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Rino 700 better than Terra?

Rino 700 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Terra better than Rino 700?

  1. Screen size2.2″ vs 3.7″+68%
  2. Battery life13 h vs 19 h+46%
  3. Weight268 g vs 198 g+35%
Specifications

Side by side

Garmin Rino 700Garmin Rino 700≈ $3503.6
TwoNav TerraTwoNav Terra≈ $3507.5
Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS—
Satellite systems supported2—
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)No—
Display
Screen size2.2″3.7″
Resolution128 × 160480 × 640
Horizontal resolution128 px480 px
Vertical resolution160 px640 px
Pixel density93 ppi—
Display typeMonochrome LCDTransflective colour (sunlight-readable)
Touchscreen—Yes
Maps & navigation
Preloaded mapsNo—
Internal storage—32 GB
Memory card slotNo—
Waypoints1,000—
Connectivity & safety
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life13 h19 h
Battery capacity—3,000 mAh
Power sourceBuilt-in rechargeable—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIPX7IP67
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
MIL-STD-810—Yes
Operating temperature (min)—-20 °C
Operating temperature (max)—70 °C
Weight268 g198 g
Width60 mm80 mm
Height178 mm115 mm
Depth44 mm19 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare