- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- zūmo 396 vs zūmo XT
Garmin zūmo 396 vs Garmin zūmo XT
What zūmo 396 does better (1) and where zūmo XT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is zūmo 396 better than zūmo XT?
- Weight241 g vs 262 g+9%
Why is zūmo XT better than zūmo 396?
- Battery life4 h vs 6 h+50%
- Screen size4.3″ vs 5.5″+28%
- Pixel density128 ppi vs 267 ppi2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 3 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 4.3″ | 5.5″ |
| Resolution | 480 × 272 | 1280 × 720 |
| Horizontal resolution | 480 px | 1,280 px |
| Vertical resolution | 272 px | 720 px |
| Pixel density | 128 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Display type | Colour TFT LCD | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Glove-friendly touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | — |
| Map coverage | Europe | — |
| Map types | Road | — |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Free map updates | Yes | — |
| Speed camera alerts | Yes | — |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | Yes | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 6 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 241 g | 262 g |
| Width | 125 mm | — |
| Height | 86 mm | — |
| Depth | 25 mm | — |
