- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- zūmo XT vs Rider 500
Garmin zūmo XT vs TomTom Rider 500
What zūmo XT does better (3) and where Rider 500 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is zūmo XT better than Rider 500?
- Screen size5.5″ vs 4.3″+28%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 128 ppi2.1×
- Weight262 g vs 280 g+7%
Why is Rider 500 better than zūmo XT?
Rider 500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 3 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.5″ | 4.3″ |
| Resolution | 1280 × 720 | 480 × 272 |
| Horizontal resolution | 1,280 px | 480 px |
| Vertical resolution | 720 px | 272 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 128 ppi |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Glove-friendly touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | — | Yes |
| Map coverage | — | Europe |
| Map types | — | Road |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Free map updates | — | Yes |
| Live traffic | — | Yes |
| Speed camera alerts | — | Yes |
| Truck / RV routing (size and weight) | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 6 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 262 g | 280 g |
| Width | — | 137 mm |
| Height | — | 88 mm |
| Depth | — | 30 mm |
