- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- iRTK4 vs iRTK5
Hi-Target iRTK4 vs Hi-Target iRTK5
What iRTK4 does better (4) and where iRTK5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is iRTK4 better than iRTK5?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Battery life10 h vs 9 h+11%
- Tracking channels866 vs 3362.6×
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
Why is iRTK5 better than iRTK4?
- Operating temperature (min)-30 °C vs -40 °C+-25%
- Operating temperature (max)70 °C vs 75 °C+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 866 | 336 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 9 h |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | 6,800 mAh |
| External power input | 6-28V DC external power input (5-pin port) with over-discharge protection | 6-28V DC external power input（5-pin port） with over-discharge protection |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 70 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | — | 1,200 g |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 98 mm |
| Housing material | Magnesium Alloy | Magnesium Alloy |
