- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Falcon X vs eRTK80
Alpha GEO Falcon X vs eSurvey eRTK80
What Falcon X does better (1) and where eRTK80 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Falcon X better than eRTK80?
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · eRTK80: No
Why is eRTK80 better than Falcon X?
- Battery life3 h vs 10 h3.3×
- Weight1,800 g vs 1,100 g+64%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | No |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 3 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Power source | — | Removable rechargeable pack |
| Hot-swappable batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,800 g | 1,100 g |
| Width | — | 159 mm |
| Height | 301 mm | 78 mm |
| Depth | 138 mm | 159 mm |
