- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Falcon X vs Xbase
Alpha GEO Falcon X vs SingularXYZ Xbase
What Falcon X does better (0) and where Xbase wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Falcon X better than Xbase?
Falcon X has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Xbase better than Falcon X?
- Battery life3 h vs 8 h2.7×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Weight1,800 g vs 1,204 g+50%
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 3 h | 8 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,800 g | 1,204 g |
| Width | — | 145 mm |
| Height | 301 mm | 93 mm |
| Depth | 138 mm | 145 mm |
| Housing material | — | Magnesium-aluminum Alloy |
