- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- L300 vs TRIUMPH-3
Alpha GEO L300 vs JAVAD TRIUMPH-3
What L300 does better (3) and where TRIUMPH-3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
L300TRIUMPH-3
| L300 | TRIUMPH-3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 78 mm | +72 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 182 mm | −32 mm |
| Depth | 71 mm | 96 mm | −25 mm |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 1,250 g | −250 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L300 better than TRIUMPH-3?
- Weight1,000 g vs 1,250 g+25%
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 874+61%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 60 °C+25%
Why is TRIUMPH-3 better than L300?
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Frequency bands | — | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 874 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | UHF radio, L-band / PPP |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 21 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 12 h |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 1,250 g |
| Width | 150 mm | 182 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 78 mm |
| Depth | 71 mm | 96 mm |
| Housing material | ABS,aluminium alloy | Moulded magnesium alloy and plastic |
