- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- L300 vs Catalyst DA2
Alpha GEO L300 vs Trimble Catalyst DA2
What L300 does better (3) and where Catalyst DA2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Positioning9.1
6.2Durability3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
L300Catalyst DA2
| L300 | Catalyst DA2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 60 mm | +90 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 130 mm | +20 mm |
| Depth | 71 mm | 130 mm | −59 mm |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 300 g | +700 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L300 better than Catalyst DA2?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 60 °C+25%
Why is Catalyst DA2 better than L300?
- Weight1,000 g vs 300 g3.3×
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 300 g |
| Width | 150 mm | 130 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 60 mm |
| Depth | 71 mm | 130 mm |
| Housing material | ABS,aluminium alloy | Plastic |
