LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. Matrix VI vs inBase

Alpha GEO Matrix VI vs INTEC inBase

What Matrix VI does better (1) and where inBase wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Alpha GEO Matrix VI
Alpha GEO · 2025Matrix VI
9.2Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
INTEC inBase
INTEC · 2025inBase
8.4Score
1 advantage
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
5.6Battery8.4

Why is Matrix VI better than inBase?

  1. Weight800 g vs 850 g+6%

Why is inBase better than Matrix VI?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 18 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systems—GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
Satellite systems supported—4
Tracking channels1,4081,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)YesYes
Tilt compensation (IMU)—Yes
Max. tilt angle—120°
Correction sourcesL-band / PPP, SBASNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem, SBAS
Built-in UHF radio—Yes
L-band / PPP correctionsYes—
Maps & navigation
Internal storage64 GB—
Connectivity & safety
Wi-Fi—Yes
BluetoothYesYes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)—Yes
NFC—Yes
USB-C—Yes
CameraYes—
Battery & power
Battery life12 h18 h
Battery capacity7,000 mAh—
Power sourceBuilt-in rechargeable—
External power input9~24V DC external power input to 5-pin LEMO port—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
Drop resistance2 m—
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C—
Operating temperature (max)75 °C—
Weight800 g850 g
Width99 mm—
Height129 mm—
Depth129 mm—
Housing materialMagnesium alloyABS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare