- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Matrix X vs Magic L
Alpha GEO Matrix X vs INTEC Magic L
What Matrix X does better (1) and where Magic L wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Matrix XMagic L
| Matrix X | Magic L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 109 mm | −19 mm |
| Width | 128 mm | 132 mm | −4 mm |
| Depth | 128 mm | 132 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 850 g | +150 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Matrix X better than Magic L?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
Why is Magic L better than Matrix X?
- Battery life15 h vs 18 h+20%
- Weight1,000 g vs 850 g+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 120° | 120° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 18 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 850 g |
| Width | 128 mm | 132 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 109 mm |
| Depth | 128 mm | 132 mm |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
