- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex Mini vs A300
Bad Elf Flex Mini vs ComNav A300
What Flex Mini does better (1) and where A300 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flex MiniA300
| Flex Mini | A300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 126 mm | −36 mm |
| Width | 45 mm | 250 mm | −205 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 250 mm | −218 mm |
| Weight | 143 g | 2,000 g | −1,857 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex Mini better than A300?
- Weight143 g vs 2,000 g14×
Why is A300 better than Flex Mini?
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
- Tracking channels135 vs 9657.1×
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L5, E1, E5a, B1, B2 | — |
| Tracking channels | 135 | 965 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | — |
| External power input | — | 6-36 |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 75 °C |
| Weight | 143 g | 2,000 g |
| Width | 45 mm | 250 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 126 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 250 mm |
| Housing material | Polycarbonate | FRP cover & aluminum alloy base |
