- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex Mini vs Archer 4
Bad Elf Flex Mini vs Juniper Archer 4
What Flex Mini does better (0) and where Archer 4 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flex MiniArcher 4
| Flex Mini | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 102 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 45 mm | 42 mm | +3 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 34 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 143 g | 42 g | +101 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex Mini better than Archer 4?
Flex Mini has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Archer 4 better than Flex Mini?
- Weight143 g vs 42 g3.4×
- Tracking channels135 vs 184+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L5, E1, E5a, B1, B2 | — |
| Tracking channels | 135 | 184 |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | — |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Weight | 143 g | 42 g |
| Width | 45 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | Polycarbonate | N/A |
