- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M20 vs A300
Bynav M20 vs ComNav A300
What M20 does better (2) and where A300 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is M20 better than A300?
- Tracking channels1,507 vs 965+56%
- Operating temperature (max)85 °C vs 75 °C+13%
Why is A300 better than M20?
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Tracking channels | 1,507 | 965 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | 5V; 3.3V | 6-36 |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | — | 2,000 g |
| Width | 22 mm | 250 mm |
| Height | 17 mm | 126 mm |
| Depth | — | 250 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium | FRP cover & aluminum alloy base |
