- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M20 vs Reach RS3
Bynav M20 vs Emlid Reach RS3
What M20 does better (1) and where Reach RS3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is M20 better than Reach RS3?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
Why is Reach RS3 better than M20?
Reach RS3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 1,507 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | 5V; 3.3V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | — |
| Width | 22 mm | — |
| Height | 17 mm | — |
| Housing material | Aluminium | — |
