- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M20 vs R580
Bynav M20 vs Trimble R580
What M20 does better (4) and where R580 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is M20 better than R580?
- Tracking channels1,507 vs 3364.5×
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Operating temperature (max)85 °C vs 55 °C+55%
Why is R580 better than M20?
R580 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5 |
| Tracking channels | 1,507 | 336 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 5 h |
| External power input | 5V; 3.3V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | 55 °C |
| Weight | — | 1,080 g |
| Width | 22 mm | 140 mm |
| Height | 17 mm | 114 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium | Plastic with metal endoskeleton |
