- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M20 vs HiPer CR
Bynav M20 vs Topcon HiPer CR
What M20 does better (3) and where HiPer CR wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is M20 better than HiPer CR?
- Tracking channels1,507 vs 2266.7×
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)85 °C vs 60 °C+42%
Why is HiPer CR better than M20?
HiPer CR has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,507 | 226 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| External power input | 5V; 3.3V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | — | 440 g |
| Width | 22 mm | 50 mm |
| Height | 17 mm | 200 mm |
| Depth | — | 50 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium | Magnesium |
