- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- M20 vs Catalyst DA2
Bynav M20 vs Trimble Catalyst DA2
What M20 does better (2) and where Catalyst DA2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
4.0Positioning9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
M20Catalyst DA2
| M20 | Catalyst DA2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 17 mm | 60 mm | −43 mm |
| Width | 22 mm | 130 mm | −108 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M20 better than Catalyst DA2?
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)85 °C vs 60 °C+42%
Why is Catalyst DA2 better than M20?
Catalyst DA2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 1,507 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | 5V; 3.3V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | — | 300 g |
| Width | 22 mm | 130 mm |
| Height | 17 mm | 60 mm |
| Depth | — | 130 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminium | Plastic |
