- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- X8-M1 vs Archer 4
Bynav X8-M1 vs Juniper Archer 4
What X8-M1 does better (1) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8-M1Archer 4
| X8-M1 | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 133 mm | 102 mm | +31 mm |
| Width | 33 mm | 42 mm | −9 mm |
| Depth | 30 mm | 34 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 104 g | 42 g | +62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8-M1 better than Archer 4?
- Tracking channels1,500 vs 1848.2×
Why is Archer 4 better than X8-M1?
- Weight104 g vs 42 g2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,500 | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | — |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,300 mAh | — |
| External power input | USB Type-C (5V/1A input) | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 1.5 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 70 °C | — |
| Weight | 104 g | 42 g |
| Width | 33 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 133 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 30 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | ABS flame-retardant plastic | N/A |
