- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- X8-M2 vs Archer 4
Bynav X8-M2 vs Juniper Archer 4
What X8-M2 does better (1) and where Archer 4 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X8-M2 better than Archer 4?
- L-band / PPP correctionsYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than X8-M2?
Archer 4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP65 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Weight | — | 42 g |
| Width | — | 42 mm |
| Height | — | 102 mm |
| Depth | — | 34 mm |
| Housing material | — | N/A |
