- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- X8-M2 vs CGI-230
Bynav X8-M2 vs CHCNAV CGI-230
What X8-M2 does better (0) and where CGI-230 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X8-M2 better than CGI-230?
X8-M2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is CGI-230 better than X8-M2?
CGI-230 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP65 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 75 °C |
| Weight | — | 400 g |
| Width | — | 105 mm |
| Height | — | 350 mm |
| Depth | — | 154 mm |
