LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. CGI-830 vs Archer 4

CHCNAV CGI-830 vs Juniper Archer 4

What CGI-830 does better (0) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV CGI-830
CHCNAV · 2024CGI-830
6.1Score
0 advantages
Higher score
vs
Juniper Archer 4
Juniper · 2024Archer 4
1 advantage
Dimensions

Size comparison

CGI-830Archer 4
120 × 5316242 × 10234
CGI-830Archer 4Difference
Height53 mm102 mm−49 mm
Width120 mm42 mm+78 mm
Depth162 mm34 mm+128 mm
Weight1,150 g42 g+1,108 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CGI-830 better than Archer 4?

CGI-830 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Archer 4 better than CGI-830?

  1. Weight1,150 g vs 42 g27.4×
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Tracking channels—184
RTK positioning—Yes
Tilt compensation (IMU)Yes—
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), Cellular modemNTRIP (internet)
Built-in UHF radio—No
L-band / PPP corrections—No
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)Yes—
Battery & power
External power input9 V ~ 32 V DC Standard Adaptation 12 V DC—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
MIL-STD-810Yes—
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C—
Operating temperature (max)75 °C—
Weight1,150 g42 g
Width120 mm42 mm
Height53 mm102 mm
Depth162 mm34 mm
Housing material—N/A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare